PBA vs. DWSN, CNQ, ENB, CEG, EOG, SLB, MPC, PXD, EPD, and PSX
Should you be buying Pembina Pipeline stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Pembina Pipeline include Dawson Geophysical (DWSN), Canadian Natural Resources (CNQ), Enbridge (ENB), Constellation Energy (CEG), EOG Resources (EOG), Schlumberger (SLB), Marathon Petroleum (MPC), Pioneer Natural Resources (PXD), Enterprise Products Partners (EPD), and Phillips 66 (PSX). These companies are all part of the "oils/energy" sector.
Pembina Pipeline (NYSE:PBA) and Dawson Geophysical (NASDAQ:DWSN) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, community ranking, risk and valuation.
Pembina Pipeline currently has a consensus target price of $44.75, suggesting a potential upside of 20.52%. Given Pembina Pipeline's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Pembina Pipeline is more favorable than Dawson Geophysical.
Pembina Pipeline received 327 more outperform votes than Dawson Geophysical when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 66.54% of users gave Pembina Pipeline an outperform vote while only 60.84% of users gave Dawson Geophysical an outperform vote.
In the previous week, Pembina Pipeline had 9 more articles in the media than Dawson Geophysical. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Pembina Pipeline and 4 mentions for Dawson Geophysical. Pembina Pipeline's average media sentiment score of 1.04 beat Dawson Geophysical's score of 0.95 indicating that Pembina Pipeline is being referred to more favorably in the media.
Pembina Pipeline has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its share price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Dawson Geophysical has a beta of 0.78, indicating that its share price is 22% less volatile than the S&P 500.
Pembina Pipeline has higher revenue and earnings than Dawson Geophysical. Dawson Geophysical is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pembina Pipeline, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Pembina Pipeline has a net margin of 21.61% compared to Dawson Geophysical's net margin of -5.95%. Pembina Pipeline's return on equity of 13.33% beat Dawson Geophysical's return on equity.
55.4% of Pembina Pipeline shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 7.9% of Dawson Geophysical shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Pembina Pipeline shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.2% of Dawson Geophysical shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.
Summary
Pembina Pipeline beats Dawson Geophysical on 16 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Pembina Pipeline News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for PBA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding PBA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Pembina Pipeline Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
