SM vs. EQT, MRO, RRC, SWN, MTDR, CRK, KOS, SBOW, EGY, and BRY
Should you be buying SM Energy stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of SM Energy include EQT (EQT), Marathon Oil (MRO), Range Resources (RRC), Southwestern Energy (SWN), Matador Resources (MTDR), Comstock Resources (CRK), Kosmos Energy (KOS), SilverBow Resources (SBOW), VAALCO Energy (EGY), and Berry (BRY). These companies are all part of the "oil & gas exploration & production" industry.
EQT (NYSE:EQT) and SM Energy (NYSE:SM) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, community ranking, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, profitability and valuation.
SM Energy has a net margin of 31.80% compared to SM Energy's net margin of 10.96%. EQT's return on equity of 20.10% beat SM Energy's return on equity.
EQT currently has a consensus price target of $44.94, suggesting a potential upside of 9.37%. SM Energy has a consensus price target of $54.57, suggesting a potential upside of 8.21%. Given SM Energy's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe EQT is more favorable than SM Energy.
In the previous week, EQT had 5 more articles in the media than SM Energy. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for EQT and 12 mentions for SM Energy. EQT's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat SM Energy's score of 0.29 indicating that SM Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.
SM Energy received 12 more outperform votes than EQT when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 68.17% of users gave EQT an outperform vote while only 65.72% of users gave SM Energy an outperform vote.
EQT pays an annual dividend of $0.63 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. SM Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. EQT pays out 45.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SM Energy pays out 11.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. EQT has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and SM Energy has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years.
EQT has a beta of 1.09, suggesting that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, SM Energy has a beta of 4.21, suggesting that its stock price is 321% more volatile than the S&P 500.
EQT has higher revenue and earnings than SM Energy. SM Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EQT, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
90.8% of EQT shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.6% of SM Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of EQT shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of SM Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.
Summary
SM Energy beats EQT on 12 of the 21 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get SM Energy News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SM and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SM and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
SM Energy Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
