ECL vs. SHW, IFF, CE, ALB, RPM, NEU, ASH, BCPC, FUL, and KWR
Should you be buying Ecolab stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Ecolab include Sherwin-Williams (SHW), International Flavors & Fragrances (IFF), Celanese (CE), Albemarle (ALB), RPM International (RPM), NewMarket (NEU), Ashland (ASH), Balchem (BCPC), H.B. Fuller (FUL), and Quaker Chemical (KWR). These companies are all part of the "specialty chemicals" industry.
Sherwin-Williams (NYSE:SHW) and Ecolab (NYSE:ECL) are both large-cap construction companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, community ranking, profitability, earnings, valuation, risk, media sentiment, dividends and analyst recommendations.
In the previous week, Sherwin-Williams had 3 more articles in the media than Ecolab. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Sherwin-Williams and 9 mentions for Ecolab. Ecolab's average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat Sherwin-Williams' score of 0.87 indicating that Sherwin-Williams is being referred to more favorably in the media.
Sherwin-Williams pays an annual dividend of $2.86 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. Ecolab pays an annual dividend of $2.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. Sherwin-Williams pays out 30.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ecolab pays out 42.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Sherwin-Williams has increased its dividend for 47 consecutive years and Ecolab has increased its dividend for 32 consecutive years.
Sherwin-Williams has a net margin of 10.52% compared to Sherwin-Williams' net margin of 10.01%. Ecolab's return on equity of 73.74% beat Sherwin-Williams' return on equity.
Sherwin-Williams received 139 more outperform votes than Ecolab when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 64.75% of users gave Ecolab an outperform vote while only 64.30% of users gave Sherwin-Williams an outperform vote.
Sherwin-Williams has higher revenue and earnings than Ecolab. Sherwin-Williams is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ecolab, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
Sherwin-Williams currently has a consensus price target of $344.41, suggesting a potential upside of 13.37%. Ecolab has a consensus price target of $239.56, suggesting a potential upside of 3.17%. Given Ecolab's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Sherwin-Williams is more favorable than Ecolab.
77.7% of Sherwin-Williams shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 74.9% of Ecolab shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of Sherwin-Williams shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Ecolab shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.
Sherwin-Williams has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its stock price is 18% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Ecolab has a beta of 1.09, suggesting that its stock price is 9% more volatile than the S&P 500.
Summary
Sherwin-Williams beats Ecolab on 17 of the 21 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Ecolab News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ECL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ECL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Related Companies and Tools
