LAAC vs. MP, SGML, NGD, GSM, CRML, LAC, MTAL, TMC, DC, and AMLI
Should you be buying Lithium Americas (Argentina) stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Lithium Americas (Argentina) include MP Materials (MP), Sigma Lithium (SGML), New Gold (NGD), Ferroglobe (GSM), Critical Metals (CRML), Lithium Americas (LAC), Metals Acquisition (MTAL), TMC the metals (TMC), Dakota Gold (DC), and American Lithium (AMLI). These companies are all part of the "metal mining" industry.
Lithium Americas (Argentina) (NYSE:LAAC) and MP Materials (NYSE:MP) are both basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, community ranking, earnings and analyst recommendations.
In the previous week, MP Materials had 8 more articles in the media than Lithium Americas (Argentina). MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for MP Materials and 4 mentions for Lithium Americas (Argentina). Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat MP Materials' score of 0.14 indicating that Lithium Americas (Argentina) is being referred to more favorably in the media.
MP Materials has a net margin of 1.62% compared to Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s net margin of 0.00%. Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s return on equity of 3.09% beat MP Materials' return on equity.
Lithium Americas (Argentina) has higher earnings, but lower revenue than MP Materials. MP Materials is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lithium Americas (Argentina), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.
49.2% of Lithium Americas (Argentina) shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 52.6% of MP Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 19.8% of Lithium Americas (Argentina) shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 12.6% of MP Materials shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.
MP Materials received 46 more outperform votes than Lithium Americas (Argentina) when rated by MarketBeat users. Likewise, 67.95% of users gave MP Materials an outperform vote while only 50.00% of users gave Lithium Americas (Argentina) an outperform vote.
Lithium Americas (Argentina) currently has a consensus price target of $9.40, indicating a potential upside of 107.05%. MP Materials has a consensus price target of $23.64, indicating a potential upside of 45.76%. Given Lithium Americas (Argentina)'s stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Lithium Americas (Argentina) is more favorable than MP Materials.
Lithium Americas (Argentina) has a beta of 1.33, meaning that its share price is 33% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, MP Materials has a beta of 2.31, meaning that its share price is 131% more volatile than the S&P 500.
Summary
Lithium Americas (Argentina) beats MP Materials on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.
Get Lithium Americas (Argentina) News Delivered to You Automatically
Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for LAAC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.
This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding LAAC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Lithium Americas (Argentina) Competitors List
Related Companies and Tools
